Notes

These are items that bear looking into more closely.

• This institution’s six year bachelors graduation rate is 65.8%, so approximately 3/10 of undergrads who enroll do not earn a bachelors degree from here.

• Unsatisfactory conditions of academic freedom and tenure have been found to prevail at this institution according to the AAUP

Overview of institution

This, and the rest of the page, use info from the most recent year available, generally 2023.

• Institution kind: Master’s Colleges & Universities: Larger Programs

• Undergrad program: Professions focus, some graduate coexistence

• Graduate program: Research Doctoral: STEM-dominant

• Enrollment profile: High undergraduate (see more details below)

• Average net price for undergrads on financial aid: $32,641 (1.7 times the equivalent cost of Harvard).

• Actual price for your family: Go here to see what your family may be asked to pay. It can be MUCH lower than the average price but also higher for some.

• Size and setting: Four-year, small, highly residential

• In state percentage: 77% of first year students come from Michigan

• In US percentage: 91% of first year students come from the US

• Graduation rate (within 6 years) for students seeking a Bachelors: 65.8% (this is what is usually reported as “graduation rate”)

• Graduation rate (within 4 years) for students seeking a Bachelors: 34.5%

• Percent of students seeking a Bachelors who transfer out of this institution: 21.6%

• Student to tenure-stream faculty ratio: 20.9 (undergrads to tenure-stream faculty) [Tenure explained]

• Student to faculty ratio: 14.6 (undergrads to all faculty)

• Degrees offered: Certificate of at least 1 year but less than 2 years, Associate’s degree, Bachelor’s degree, Postbaccalaureate certificate, Master’s degree, Doctor’s degree: research scholarship

• Schedule: Semester

• Institution provides on campus housing: Yes

• Dorm capacity: There are enough dorm beds for 939 students

• Freshmen required to live on campus: No

• Advanced placement (AP) credits used: Yes

• Disabilities: 7.02 percent of undergrads are registered as having disabilities.

Map

Comparisons

The sections below show this institution compared with others. The ones listed are ones it has identified as peers, who consider themselves peers, and/or who the federal government considers peers. If a comparison school has the same value as the focal school, its cell is grayed out. Arrows show where there is a signficant trend over time for a school. You can swipe across the table to see more of it; the focal school column is always visible.

• Lawrence Technological University lists these schools as ones to compare itself within federal IPEDS data, and they do the same back: Illinois Institute of Technology, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, Clarkson University, Kettering University, Milwaukee School of Engineering, Madonna University, Siena Heights University, Keck Graduate Institute
• Lawrence Technological University compares itself to these institutions, but not vice versa: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Carnegie Mellon University, Boston University, California Institute of Technology, Harvey Mudd College, Case Western Reserve University, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, Stevens Institute of Technology, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Rochester Institute of Technology, Webb Institute, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Franklin W Olin College of Engineering, Franciscan University of Steubenville, Creighton University, Bethel University, Drake University, Hope College, Bradley University, Webster University, Butler University, Rockhurst University, North Central College, Baldwin Wallace University, John Carroll University, Xavier University, Lewis University, Saint Ambrose University, Aurora University, Maryville University of Saint Louis, Kalamazoo College, The University of Findlay, Bellevue University, University of Indianapolis, Ashland University, Alma College, University of Hartford, University of Detroit Mercy, Worcester State University, Hamline University, Albion College, University of Evansville, St Catherine University, Adrian College, North Park University, Walsh University, University of New Haven, Friends University, Park University, Valparaiso University, The College of Saint Scholastica, Columbia College Chicago, Rochester University, Rockford University, Dominican University, Heidelberg University, Saint Xavier University, Avila University, Aquinas College, Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, Baker University, Benedictine University, Roosevelt University, Malone University, Edgewood College, Concordia University-Wisconsin, Lindenwood University, Fontbonne University, The University of Olivet, Ursuline College, Concordia University-Chicago, Indiana Wesleyan University-Marion, Maharishi International University, Antioch University
• These institutions compare themselves to Lawrence Technological University, but not vice versa: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Daytona Beach, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Prescott, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University-Worldwide, Gannon University, Norwich University, Northwood University

Diversity

The US Census Bureau has a diversity index that goes from 0 to 1. In their words, “A 0-value indicates that everyone in the population has the same racial and ethnic characteristics. A value close to 1 indicates that everyone in the population has different racial and ethnic characteristics.” This uses their formula, but with the resolution available for the federal IPEDS data (which does not separate for a given demographic group whether members identify as Hispanic or not). This metric is about heterogeneity within the population, not the proportion of the population that comes from historically excluded groups.

Following the practice of the census, the index is multiplied by 100 to give the percentage probability a random pair of individuals will have a different background. Most institutions argue that diversity is a benefit, so by default a higher number is listed as better, but there may be cases where this measure does not reflect the mission of a college (for example, 70% of the students at a tribal college or university may be American Indian: that could be low-scoring by this metric but should not be read as “bad” given the institution’s mission).

These numbers are based on the most recent year available, generally 2023, which predates effects of the US Supreme Court’s striking down of affirmative action. This has often changed, sometimes dramatically, the incoming student demographics at some institutions.

Test scores

Majors

This presents information on the number of majors and the median earnings one and five years after graduation for people who got a degree from this institution in that field. The earnings are for those who are working and not enrolled in further education. The earnings data (from the federal college scorecard) also has information on earnings for those categorized as ‘MALE’ and ‘NOMALE’ – for readability, these are recategorized here as “Men” and “Women”, respectively, which adopts the gender binary used in other federal data. “W/M earnings ratio” is the median earnings of women divided by men, as a percentage.