Overview of institution

This, and the rest of the page, use info from the most recent year available, generally 2023.

• Institution kind: Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity

• Undergrad program: Arts & sciences plus professions, high graduate coexistence

• Graduate program: Research Doctoral: Comprehensive programs, no medical/veterinary school

• Enrollment profile: Majority undergraduate (see more details below)

• Average net price for undergrads on financial aid: $19,257 . This is 100% the average cost of Harvard.

• Actual price for your family: Go here to see what your family may be asked to pay. It can be MUCH lower than the average price but also higher for some.

• Size and setting: Four-year, large, primarily residential

• In state percentage: 78% of first year students come from California

• In US percentage: 89% of first year students come from the US

• Graduation rate (within 6 years) for students seeking a Bachelors: 94% (this is what is usually reported as “graduation rate”)

• Graduation rate (within 4 years) for students seeking a Bachelors: 81.7%

• Student to tenure-stream faculty ratio: 21.5 (undergrads to tenure-stream faculty) [Tenure explained]

• Student to faculty ratio: 16.4 (undergrads to all faculty)

• Degrees offered: Bachelor’s degree, Postbaccalaureate certificate, Master’s degree, Post master’s certificate, Doctor’s degree: research scholarship, Doctor’s degree: professional practice

• Schedule: Semester

• Institution provides on campus housing: Yes

• Dorm capacity: There are enough dorm beds for 9765 students

• Freshmen required to live on campus: No

• Advanced placement (AP) credits used: Yes

• Disabilities: 15.66 percent of undergrads are registered as having disabilities.

Map

+−

Leaflet | © OpenStreetMap, ODbL

Comparisons

The sections below show this institution compared with others. The ones listed are ones it has identified as peers, who consider themselves peers, and/or who the federal government considers peers. If a comparison school has the same value as the focal school, its cell is grayed out. In fields where there is a common view that higher (or lower) values are better, the best values are in blue, the worst values are in red. If there isn’t a sense of a particular value being better, values are shown in varying shades of green. Arrows show where there is a signficant trend over time for a school. You can swipe across the table to see more of it; the focal school column is always visible.

• These institutions compare themselves to University of California-Berkeley, but not vice versa: Cornell University, University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, United States Naval Academy, University of Florida, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, University of Virginia-Main Campus, The University of Texas at Austin, Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus, Carnegie Mellon University, Bowdoin College, California Institute of Technology, Brigham Young University, Florida State University, Texas A & M University-College Station, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, University of Maryland-College Park, Purdue University-Main Campus, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Harvey Mudd College, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus, The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, Binghamton University, University of Connecticut, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Stony Brook University, University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus, Indiana University-Bloomington, Texas Tech University, University of Missouri-Columbia, Michigan State University, University of Delaware, Iowa State University, University of Colorado Boulder, Temple University, University of Cincinnati-Main Campus, Franklin W Olin College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Jewish Theological Seminary of America, Washington State University, The University of Texas at Dallas, University of San Francisco, St. John’s University-New York, University of Wyoming, DeVry University-California, DeVry University-Nevada, University of Phoenix-Hawaii, Claremont Graduate University, University of California College of the Law-San Francisco, Vermont Law and Graduate School

Enrollment

General

Teaching

Tenure track faculty are those who are eligible for tenure. This includes both pre-tenure and tenured faculty. Once faculty get tenure, they are (generally) protected from being fired for intellectual reasons, helping to ensure their freedom in teaching and research. They can still lose their positions for misconduct, financial problems, not fulfilling their duties, or other reasons.

Non-tenure track faculty are not eligible for tenure. Some are hired one semester at a time, some have multi-year contracts. They typically have a higher teaching load than tenure track faculty, leaving less time for research or other creative endeavors. They are also easier to fire than tenured faculty. Sometimes they are external experts (a noted musician, a former senator) who are hired to teach some classes without the expected permanence of a tenure-track position.

Note that this chart uses US federal demographic data: it only has two genders and a specified set of ethnicities and races.

Having a low student to faculty ratio is considered a good thing by many, as it can mean more individual attention.

Geography

This has information on the location of the institution. See the about page for more information on what the metrics are and how they are calculated.

Financial Aid

Graduation

Note these are bachelors graduation rates in six years, not four (this is standard). Sample sizes can be small for some demographic groups with few individuals in a school, leading to large year-to-year fluctuations and often extreme values for those groups (if there are two individuals in the class with a given identity, the possible graduation rates are 0%, 50%, or 100% depending on whether zero, one, or both students graduate within six years).

Library

Libraries are changing rapidly. Note that how institutions count digital collections may vary.

Diversity

The US Census Bureau has a diversity index that goes from 0 to 1. In their words, “A 0-value indicates that everyone in the population has the same racial and ethnic characteristics. A value close to 1 indicates that everyone in the population has different racial and ethnic characteristics.” This uses their formula, but with the resolution available for the federal IPEDS data (which does not separate for a given demographic group whether members identify as Hispanic or not). This metric is about heterogeneity within the population, not the proportion of the population that comes from historically excluded groups.

Following the practice of the census, the index is multiplied by 100 to give the percentage probability a random pair of individuals will have a different background. Most institutions argue that diversity is a benefit, so by default a higher number is listed as better, but there may be cases where this measure does not reflect the mission of a college (for example, 70% of the students at a tribal college or university may be American Indian: that could be low-scoring by this metric but should not be read as “bad” given the institution’s mission).

These numbers are based on the most recent year available, generally 2023, which predates effects of the US Supreme Court’s striking down of affirmative action. This has often changed, sometimes dramatically, the incoming student demographics at some institutions.

Overall diversity

Freshman profile

Demographic data for first time degree-seeking students. Note that this uses US federal demographic data: it only has two genders and a specified set of ethnicities and races.

Freshman geography