Overview of institution

This, and the rest of the page, use info from the most recent year available, generally 2023.

• Institution kind: Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity

• Undergrad program: Balanced arts & sciences/professions, high graduate coexistence

• Graduate program: Research Doctoral: Comprehensive programs, with medical/veterinary school

• Enrollment profile: High undergraduate (see more details below)

• Average net price for undergrads on financial aid: $22,803 (1.2 times the equivalent cost of Harvard).

• Actual price for your family: Go here to see what your family may be asked to pay. It can be MUCH lower than the average price but also higher for some.

• Size and setting: Four-year, large, primarily residential

• In state percentage: 70% of first year students come from Michigan

• In US percentage: 93% of first year students come from the US

• Graduation rate (within 6 years) for students seeking a Bachelors: 81.9% (this is what is usually reported as “graduation rate”)

• Graduation rate (within 4 years) for students seeking a Bachelors: 62.9%

• Percent of students seeking a Bachelors who transfer out of this institution: 10.3%

• Student to tenure-stream faculty ratio: 20.5 (undergrads to tenure-stream faculty) [Tenure explained]

• Student to faculty ratio: 13.3 (undergrads to all faculty)

• Degrees offered: Certificate of at least 1 year but less than 2 years, Bachelor’s degree, Postbaccalaureate certificate, Master’s degree, Post master’s certificate, Doctor’s degree: research scholarship, Doctor’s degree: professional practice

• Schedule: Semester

• Institution provides on campus housing: Yes

• Dorm capacity: There are enough dorm beds for 17517 students

• Freshmen required to live on campus: No

• Advanced placement (AP) credits used: Yes

• Disabilities: 5.40 percent of undergrads are registered as having disabilities.

Map

Comparisons

The sections below show this institution compared with others. The ones listed are ones it has identified as peers, who consider themselves peers, and/or who the federal government considers peers. If a comparison school has the same value as the focal school, its cell is grayed out. Arrows show where there is a signficant trend over time for a school. You can swipe across the table to see more of it; the focal school column is always visible.

• Michigan State University lists these schools as ones to compare itself within federal IPEDS data, and they do the same back: University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Texas A & M University-College Station, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, University of Maryland-College Park, Purdue University-Main Campus, Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, University of Missouri-Columbia, Iowa State University, University of Iowa, University of Arizona
• Michigan State University compares itself to these institutions, but not vice versa: University of California-Los Angeles, Northwestern University, University of California-Berkeley, University of Florida, University of California-Irvine, University of California-San Diego, University of California-Santa Barbara, University of California-Davis, Ohio State University-Main Campus, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, University of California-Santa Cruz, Indiana University-Bloomington, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, University of Utah
• These institutions compare themselves to Michigan State University, but not vice versa: University of Virginia-Main Campus, The University of Texas at Austin, Brigham Young University, Florida State University, University of Georgia, University of Washington-Seattle Campus, North Carolina State University at Raleigh, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus, Stony Brook University, University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus, Texas Tech University, University of Delaware, Arizona State University Campus Immersion, University of Colorado Boulder, Temple University, University of Cincinnati-Main Campus, University of Kansas, University of Kentucky, Oregon State University, George Mason University, Wayne State University, Washington State University, Colorado State University-Fort Collins, CUNY City College, University of Idaho, University of Wyoming, Western Michigan University, Saginaw Valley State University, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine

Diversity

The US Census Bureau has a diversity index that goes from 0 to 1. In their words, “A 0-value indicates that everyone in the population has the same racial and ethnic characteristics. A value close to 1 indicates that everyone in the population has different racial and ethnic characteristics.” This uses their formula, but with the resolution available for the federal IPEDS data (which does not separate for a given demographic group whether members identify as Hispanic or not). This metric is about heterogeneity within the population, not the proportion of the population that comes from historically excluded groups.

Following the practice of the census, the index is multiplied by 100 to give the percentage probability a random pair of individuals will have a different background. Most institutions argue that diversity is a benefit, so by default a higher number is listed as better, but there may be cases where this measure does not reflect the mission of a college (for example, 70% of the students at a tribal college or university may be American Indian: that could be low-scoring by this metric but should not be read as “bad” given the institution’s mission).

These numbers are based on the most recent year available, generally 2023, which predates effects of the US Supreme Court’s striking down of affirmative action. This has often changed, sometimes dramatically, the incoming student demographics at some institutions.

Test scores

Majors

This presents information on the number of majors and the median earnings one and five years after graduation for people who got a degree from this institution in that field. The earnings are for those who are working and not enrolled in further education. The earnings data (from the federal college scorecard) also has information on earnings for those categorized as ‘MALE’ and ‘NOMALE’ – for readability, these are recategorized here as “Men” and “Women”, respectively, which adopts the gender binary used in other federal data. “W/M earnings ratio” is the median earnings of women divided by men, as a percentage.